New inflow performance relationship for solution-gas drive oil reservoirs
The Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) describes the behavior of the well’s flowing pressure and production rate, which is an important tool in understanding the reservoir/well behavior and quantifying the production rate. The IPR is often required for designing well completion, optimizing well production, nodal analysis calculations, and designing artificial lift. Different IPR correlations exist today in the petroleum industry with the most commonly used models are that of Vogel’s and Fetkovitch’s. In addition to few analytical correlations, that usually suffers from limited applicability. In this work, a new model to predict the IPR curve was developed, using a new correlation that accurately describes the behavior the oil mobility as a function of the average reservoir pressure. This new correlation was obtained using 47 actual field cases in addition to several simulated tests. After the development of the new model, its validity was tested by comparing its accuracy with that of the most common IPR models such as Vogel, Fetkovitch, Wiggins, and Sukarno models. Twelve field cases were used for this comparison. The results of this comparison showed that: the new developed model gave the best accuracy with an average absolute error of 6.6 %, while the other common models are ranked, according to their accuracy in the following order to be Fetkovich, Sukarno, Vogel, and Wiggins, with average absolute errors of 7 %, 12.1 %, 13.7 %, and 15.7 respectively. The new developed IPR model is simple in application, covers wide range of reservoir parameters, and requires only one test point. Therefore, it provides a considerable advantage compared to the multipoint test method of Fetkovich. Moreover, due to its accuracy and simplicity, the new IPR provides a considerable advantage compared to the widely used method of Vogel. Finally, the application of the new model is illustrated with field examples for current and future IPR computations.
- Tarek Ahmed, Paul McKinney. Advanced reservoir engineering. Elsevier Inc., Gulf Professional Publishing, 2005. PP. 342-361.
- Archer R.A., Castillo Y. Del, Blasingame T.A. New perspectives on vogel type ipr models for gas condensate and solution-gas drive systems, SPE paper 80907 presented at the SPE Production operations symposium, Oklahoma, OK, 23 25 March 2003. DOI: 10.2118/80907-MS
- Y. Del Castillo. New inflow performance relationships for gas condensate reservoirs. M.S. Thesis. Texas A& M University, May 2003, College Station.
- Elias Mohamed. New inflow performance relationship for solution gas drive reservoirs. MS thesis, U. of Cairo, Giza, Egypt (2009).
- Evinger H.H., Muskat J. Calculation of theoretical productivity factors, Transactions AIME, 1942, Vol. 146, pp. 126 - 139.
- Fetkovich M.J. The isochronal testing of oil wells. SPE Paper 4529 presented at the Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, NV, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1973. DOI: 10.2118/4529-MS
- Gallice F. A comparison of two-phase inflow performance relationships. MS thesis, U. of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (1997).
- Frederic Gallice, Michael L. Wiggins. A comparison of two-phase inflow performance relationships. SPE Paper 88445 presented at SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium, 28-31 March 1999, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. DOI: 10.2118/52171-MS
- Klins M.A., Majher M.W. Inflow Performance relationships for damaged or improved wells producing under solution-gas drive. SPE paper 19852, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1992, Vol. 44, Num. 12, pp. 1357 - 1363. DOI: 10.2118/19852-PA
- MORE Manual, Version 6.3, ROXAR (2006).
- Rajagopal Raghavan. Well test analysis. PTR Prentice Hall, 1993. PP. 513 - 514.
- Sukarno P., Wisnogroho A. Generalized two-phase IPR curve equation un-der influence of non-linear flow efficiency, Proc., Soc of Indonesian Petroleum Engineers Production Optimization Intl. Symposium, 1995, Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 31 - 3.
- Vogel J.V. Inflow performance relationships for solution gas drive wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1968, Vol. 20, Num. 1, pp. 83 - 92. (SPE Paper 1476). DOI: 10.2118/1476-PA
- Weller W.T. Reservoir performance during two-phase flow, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1966, Vol. 18, Num. 2, pp. 240 - 246. (SPE Paper 1334). DOI: 10.2118/1334-PA
- Wiggins M.L, Russel J.L., Jennings J.W. Analytical inflow performance relationships for three phase flow, SPE Paper 24055 presented at SPE Western Regional Meeting, 30 March-1 April 1992, Bakersfield, California. DOI: 10.2118/24055-MS
- Wiggins M.L., Generalized inflow performance relationships for three-phase flow, SPE Paper 25458 presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, March 21-23 1993. DOI: 10.2118/25458-MS
- Wiggins M.L., Wang H.-S. A two-phase IPR for horizontal oil wells, SPE Paper 94302 presented at SPE Production Operations Symposium, 16-19 April 2005, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. DOI: 10.2118/94302-MS
- Wiggins M.L. Inflow Performance of Oil Wells Producing Water, PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, TX (1991).
analytically IPR correlations; empirically IPR correlations; inflow performance relationship; oil mobility; solution- gas drive oil reservoir; аналитические индикаторные кривые; индикаторная кривая (диаграмма); подвижность нефти; режим растворенного газа; эмпирические индикаторные кривые References to this article (GOST) K.A. Fattah, Mohamed Elias, H. Ahmed El-Banbi, El-Sayed A. El-Tayeb New inflow performance relationship for solution-gas drive oil reservoirs // Electronic scientific journal "Oil and Gas Business". 2012. №5. P.343-366. URL: http://ogbus.ru/eng/authors/Fattah/Fattah_3.pdf